Added Oct 10, 2005
Monday, 18 October 2004
<br>
<br>
Three picture by James Lohrey, three portraits of walking women. Among the lands that an artist may need to explore, some are very dangerous, such as the sacred art and the study of the beauty of the woman.
<br>
<br>
In the case of sacred art, it is extremely easy to fall into mannerism; and to tell the truth in recent times sacred art could produce, with a few exceptions, just small holy pictures; maybe big pictures for what concerns the size, but small for what concerns their capacity of telling us of God. Nothing that can be compared with the masterpieces of the ancient Masters. Also those great artists of the twentieth century which attempted sacred art, it seems to me, could not do much more than pleasant works.
<br>
<br>
I think that the situation is not much different if we consider how the woman is represented in art: we'll find lots of oleography. Oleographic and stereotyped are most of the images pubblished by the magazines, such as fashion magazines; but also many ( or most) of the artistic nudes that we can see fall into oleography, if not into pornography. Also many advertising campaings aiming at shocking the public cannot do much more than stereotypes. This happens because the woman (but also the man) is only used; there is not the wish to understand and to describe her: she, a car or a water closet are showed just to stimulate consumers' purchases.
<br><br>
As the woman and her body is so much used for this purpose, it may be a bit difficult to realize the difference between this way of using and showing the woman, and the purity of a disinterested research led by someone, like James Lohrey, who devoted his own life to the study of femininity. But it will be easy to overcome these difficulties if only one looks at some of his pictures: they do not contain any purchase proposal, they do not press, they do not overwhelm, nor wink, they do not shout, they do not offend; they simply tell the beauty. And this is art.
<br>
<br>
by RM, Finearts-Blog ©